Evidence federal prosecutors obtained through searches of Sean "Diddy" Combs' homes in Los Angeles and Miami and elsewhere must be suppressed because the warrants that authorized those searches were unconstitutional,

The disgraced music mogul’s lawyers are pushing to have some evidence obtained during raids on his homes in Los Angeles and Miami suppressed because the feds allegedly lied to obtain the search

Sean “Diddy” Combs is still fighting to have his sex trafficking and racketeering charges against him dropped, and now his attorneys are claiming that the search warrants used to search his homes in Los Angeles and Miami were “unconstitutional.

The departure, confirmed through a motion filed in the Southern District of New York federal court, has sparked discussions about the potential implications for Diddy’s legal strategy as he faces severe charges including sex trafficking, racketeering, and kidnapping.

Defense attorneys for Sean “Diddy” Combs are seeking to suppress evidence they call “illegally” obtained during the raids on his homes in Los Angeles and Miami. The raids eventually led to Combs’ federal criminal indictment.

Sean "Diddy" Combs' defense attorneys stated that the search warrants issued for his residences in Los Angeles, Miami and other locations were unconstitutional.

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' legal team have filed new motions questioning the evidence found during the search warrants of his mansions, including more than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and lubricant and three A

Combs' lawyers are arguing evidence obtained when Homeland Security agents raided his homes following his arrest must be suppressed because the searches were unconstitutional.